For reviewersFor editorsFor librarians
NNextGenIQ Press
Sign inRegisterSubmit manuscript
IJEIInternational Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation
Entrepreneurship and innovation

International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation

IJEI·ISSN (online): applied for·Continuous publication since 2026
Open accessDouble-blind peer reviewCC BY 4.0Open for submissions
Submit manuscriptGuide for authorsSign up for article alerts
0Articles published
38 daysMedian time to first decision
41%Acceptance rate (2026)
0Downloads in the last 12 months
Journal home
Authors

Editorial and Peer Review Process

International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation · Last updated 1 September 2026

1Overview

IJEI is committed to maintaining a rigorous, fair, constructive, and transparent editorial process.

2Step 1 — Manuscript Submission

Authors submit their manuscript through the journal's online submission system.

3Step 2 — Administrative Screening

The Editorial Office checks the submission for completeness, formatting, required declarations, and basic compliance with journal requirements.

4Step 3 — Editorial Assessment

The Editor-in-Chief or a designated editor evaluates the manuscript for:

  • Relevance to IJEI's scope
  • Academic quality
  • Originality
  • Contribution to knowledge
  • Methodological appropriateness
  • Overall suitability for peer review

4.1Desk decisions

Manuscripts that clearly fall outside the journal's scope or quality requirements may be declined without external review.

5Step 4 — Peer Review

Suitable manuscripts are sent to independent experts for double-blind peer review.

Reviewers evaluate aspects such as originality, methodological rigor, validity, clarity, significance, literature coverage, and contribution to the field.

6Step 5 — Editorial Decision

Following peer review, the editor may recommend:

  • Accept
  • Minor Revision
  • Major Revision
  • Reject

6.1Basis of decisions

Editorial decisions are based on the manuscript's scholarly merit and reviewer assessments. Reviewers provide recommendations, while the final publication decision remains with the responsible editor.

7Step 6 — Revision

Authors receiving a revision decision should submit a revised manuscript together with a point-by-point response explaining how reviewer and editor comments have been addressed.

8Step 7 — Final Decision

The revised manuscript may be accepted, returned for additional revision, sent for further peer review, or rejected.

9Step 8 — Production

Accepted manuscripts undergo production processes that may include copyediting, typesetting, metadata preparation, author proofing, and final publication.